๐ค Consensus & Coordination in Distributed Systems
Welcome back to The Code Hut Distributed Systems series! In this post, we’ll explore how distributed nodes agree on shared state and coordinate their actions — a core challenge in distributed systems. ๐ค
⚠️ Why Consensus Matters
In a distributed system, multiple nodes must agree on key decisions, such as:
- ๐ Which node becomes the leader?
- ๐พ Which transaction should commit?
- ๐ How to maintain consistent data across nodes?
Without proper coordination, you risk data inconsistency, split-brain scenarios, or lost updates.
๐ Leader Election
Leader election is a common pattern where one node acts as the coordinator. Popular approaches include:
- Using Zookeeper to manage ephemeral nodes
- Distributed algorithms like Raft or Paxos
๐ Raft Algorithm (Overview)
Raft ensures consensus by:
- Electing a leader
- Replicating logs consistently across followers
- Handling leader failures gracefully
In Java, libraries like Atomix or Copycat help implement Raft-based coordination.
๐น Paxos Algorithm (Overview)
Paxos is another consensus protocol that guarantees agreement even if some nodes fail. It’s mathematically rigorous but more complex to implement than Raft.
๐ Practical Coordination in Java
Distributed locks are a simple way to coordinate actions between nodes. For example, using Redisson with Redis:
RLock lock = redisson.getLock("resourceLock");
lock.lock();
try {
// critical section
} finally {
lock.unlock();
}
This prevents multiple nodes from updating the same resource concurrently.
Next in the Series
In the next post, we’ll explore Transactions & Sagas and how to manage distributed transactions safely in Java. ๐
Label for this post: Distributed Systems
Comments
Post a Comment