๐Ÿค Consensus & Coordination in Distributed Systems

Welcome back to The Code Hut Distributed Systems series! In this post, we’ll explore how distributed nodes agree on shared state and coordinate their actions — a core challenge in distributed systems. ๐Ÿค

⚠️ Why Consensus Matters

In a distributed system, multiple nodes must agree on key decisions, such as:

  • ๐Ÿ‘‘ Which node becomes the leader?
  • ๐Ÿ’พ Which transaction should commit?
  • ๐Ÿ”„ How to maintain consistent data across nodes?

Without proper coordination, you risk data inconsistency, split-brain scenarios, or lost updates.

๐Ÿ‘‘ Leader Election

Leader election is a common pattern where one node acts as the coordinator. Popular approaches include:

  • Using Zookeeper to manage ephemeral nodes
  • Distributed algorithms like Raft or Paxos

๐Ÿ“ Raft Algorithm (Overview)

Raft ensures consensus by:

  • Electing a leader
  • Replicating logs consistently across followers
  • Handling leader failures gracefully

In Java, libraries like Atomix or Copycat help implement Raft-based coordination.

๐Ÿ”น Paxos Algorithm (Overview)

Paxos is another consensus protocol that guarantees agreement even if some nodes fail. It’s mathematically rigorous but more complex to implement than Raft.

๐Ÿ›  Practical Coordination in Java

Distributed locks are a simple way to coordinate actions between nodes. For example, using Redisson with Redis:


RLock lock = redisson.getLock("resourceLock");
lock.lock();
try {
    // critical section
} finally {
    lock.unlock();
}

This prevents multiple nodes from updating the same resource concurrently.

Next in the Series

In the next post, we’ll explore Transactions & Sagas and how to manage distributed transactions safely in Java. ๐Ÿ”„

Label for this post: Distributed Systems

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

๐Ÿ› ️ The Code Hut - Index

๐Ÿ›ก️ Resilience Patterns in Distributed Systems

๐Ÿ›ก️ Thread-Safe Programming in Java: Locks, Atomic Variables & LongAdder